Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb |
|---|---|
| Von: |
Christian Alexander
|
| Person: |
Alexander, Christian
1975- Verfasser aut |
| Hauptverfasser: | |
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Tübingen
Mohr Siebeck
2010
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Ius privatum
147 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018632505&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018632505&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Beschreibung: | XXXVIII, 769 S. |
| ISBN: | 9783161501302 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035772844 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20100527 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 091015s2010 xx m||| 00||| ger d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783161501302 |9 978-3-16-150130-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)698875909 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DNB997513209 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a ger | |
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-M382 |a DE-29 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-12 |a DE-19 |a DE-384 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-739 | ||
| 084 | |a PE 760 |0 (DE-625)135556: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PE 790 |0 (DE-625)135560: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Alexander, Christian |d 1975- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)13921478X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht |b privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb |c Christian Alexander |
| 264 | 1 | |a Tübingen |b Mohr Siebeck |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a XXXVIII, 769 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Ius privatum |v 147 | |
| 502 | |a Zugl.: München, Univ., Habil.-Schr., 2009 | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Unlauterer Wettbewerb |0 (DE-588)4061842-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kartellrecht |0 (DE-588)4029788-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gewinnabschöpfung |0 (DE-588)4253160-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schadensersatz |0 (DE-588)4051927-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gewinnabschöpfung |0 (DE-588)4253160-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Schadensersatz |0 (DE-588)4051927-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Unlauterer Wettbewerb |0 (DE-588)4061842-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Kartellrecht |0 (DE-588)4029788-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Ius privatum |v 147 |w (DE-604)BV005424152 |9 147 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018632505&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018632505&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018632505 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-UBR_call_number | 31/PE 760 A375 |
|---|---|
| DE-BY-UBR_katkey | 4567126 |
| DE-BY-UBR_location | UB Lesesaal Recht 1 |
| DE-BY-UBR_media_number | 069037501060 |
| _version_ | 1835114070104080384 |
| adam_text |
Schadensersatz- und Abschöpfungs¬
ansprüche gehören zu den privat¬
rechtlichen Sanktionen im Recht
gegen unlauteren Wettbewerb und
im Recht gegen Wettbewerbsbe¬
schränkungen. Christian Alexander
untersucht den Prozess der Verände¬
rung, den beide Rechtsgebiete durch¬
laufen, und der maßgeblich auf den
Einflüssen des Europäischen Rechts
beruht. Wichtige Änderungen be¬
treffen dabei vor allem die privat¬
rechtlichen Sanktionen. Die private
Rechtsdurchsetzung durch Markt¬
akteure soll weiter gestärkt und aus¬
gebaut werden, wobei Schadens¬
ersatz- und Abschöpfungsansprüchen
eine Schlüsselrolle zukommt. Der
Autor zeigt,
dass
Ausgestaltung und
Anwendung dieser Ansprüche durch
ein mehrdimensionales Zusammen¬
spiel individueller und überindivi¬
dueller Interessen geprägt sind und
ordnet sie in die Strukturen des
Privatrechts ein. Dabei berücksichtigt
er auch die europarechtlichen und
verfassungsrechtlichen Grundlagen.
CONTENTS PREFACE V TABLE OF CASES XIX TABLE OF LEGISLATION LIX 1 .
REFERENCES FOR PRELIMINARY RULINGS 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. PRELIMINARY
RULINGS IN THE COMMUNITY JUDICIAL SYSTEM 1 1.2. THE STRUCTURE OF THIS
BOOK 3 2. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRELIMINARY REFERENCE PROCEDURE
4 3. OUTLINE OF THE DIFFERENT POSSIBILITIES OF MAKING REFERENCES TO THE
COURT OF JUSTICE 8 3.1. OVERVIEW 8 3.2. ARTICLE 68 OF THE EC TREATY 9
3.3. ARTICLE 35 OFTHEEU TREATY 10 3.4. THE EURATOM TREATY 11 3.5.
CONVENTIONS 11 3.6. PRELIMINARY REFERENCES AND THE COMMON FOREIGN AND
SECURITY POLICY 13 3.7. THE TREATY OF LISBON 13 4. REFERENCES TO THE
EFTA COURT 16 5. OTHER WAYS OF OBTAINING LEGAL GUIDANCE FROM COMMUNITY
BODIES 17 5.1. ASKING THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR GUIDANCE ON THE
INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY LAW 17 5.1.1. QUESTIONS ON COMPETITION AND
STATE AID LAW 17 5.1.2. QUESTIONS THAT DO NOT CONCERN COMPETITION OR
STATE AID LAW 19 5.2. ASKING THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN FOR GUIDANCE ON THE
INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY LAW 22 6. THE PRELIMINARY REFERENCE SYSTEM
IN THE FUTURE 25 6.1. OVERVIEW 25 6.2. TRANSFER OF PRELIMINARY CASES TO
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE 26 6.3. GREEN LIGHT PROCEDURES 30 6.4.
DOCKET CONTROL 31 VLL CONTENTS 6.5. LIMITING THE RIGHT TO REFER TO
COURTS OF LAST INSTANCE 33 6.6. DECENTRALISED COMMUNITY COURTS 34 6.7.
THE BEST WAY FORWARD? 35 2. VARIATIONS IN MEMBER STATE USE OF
PRELIMINARY REFERENCES 37 1. THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRELIMINARY REFERENCES
AMONG THE MEMBER STATES 37 1.1. OVERVIEW 37 1.2. THE NUMBER OF
REFERENCES FROM THE DIFFERENT MEMBER STATES 38 1.3. DISTRIBUTION OF
REFERENCES BETWEEN HIGHER AND LOWER COURTS 38 2. WHY DO COURTS IN SOME
MEMBER STATES REFER MORE THAN OTHERS? 41 2.1. OVERVIEW 41 2.2.
DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION FIGURES 42 2.3. THE AMOUNT OF CROSS-BORDER
ACTIVITY 43 2.4. LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY LAW 44 2.5-
DIFFERENCES IN LITIGATION PATTERNS 47 2.6. CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITIONS 49
2.7. INTER-COURT COMPETITION*CIRCUMVENTING THE PRACTICE OF HIGHER COURTS
52 2.8. THE NATIONAL COURT'S POLICY PREFERENCES 54 2.9. SPECIALISED
JUDICIARY VS NON-SPECIALISED JUDICIARY 55 2.10. SPECIAL FACTORS IN THE
NATIONAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM 56 2.11. THE LINK BETWEEN THE USE OF ARTICLE
234 AND THE ATTITUDE TO COMMUNITY LAW BY NATIONAL COURTS 56 2.12.
CONCLUSION*WHY DO SOME MEMBER STATES MAKE MORE PRELIMINARY REFERENCES
THAN OTHERS? 58 3. WHICH BODIES MAY REFER? 59 1. WH O MAY REFER
PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS? 59 2. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING WHETHER THERE IS A
'COURT OR TRIBUNAL' ENTITLED TO MAKE A REFERENCE 60 2.1. IS THE BODY
ESTABLISHED BY LAW? 61 2.2. DOES THE BODY HAVE A PERMANENT CHARACTER? 62
2.3. IS THE BODY INDEPENDENT? 62 2.4. IS THE JURISDICTION OF THE BODY
COMPULSORY? 65 2.5. DOES THE BODY USE AN ADVERSARY PROCEDURE? 65 2.6.
DOES THE BODY TAKE ITS DECISIONS ON THE BASIS OF LEGAL RULES? 66 2.7.
MUST THE MEMBERS OF THE REFERRING BODY INCLUDE LAWYERS? 68 2.8. DOES THE
QUESTION ARISE IN CONNECTION WITH THE SETTLEMENT OF A DISPUTE? 68 2.9.
ARE THERE OTHER JUDICIAL SOLUTIONS TO THE CONFLICT IN QUESTION? 69 2.10.
THE COURT'S WEIGHTING OF THE DIFFERENT CRITERIA 70 VUI CONTENTS 3. WHICH
BODIES QUALIFY AS A'COURT OR TRIBUNAL'? 71 3.1. JUDICIAL BODIES 72
3.1.1. ORDINARY NATIONAL COURTS 72 3.1.2. INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND
COURTS WITH JURISDICTION IN MORE MEMBER STATES 72 3.1.3. ACTIVITIES
WHICH DO NOT LEAD TO DECISIONS OF A JUDICIAL NATURE 73 3.1.4. THE
FUNCTION AS A JUDICIAL BODY IS COMBINED WITH OTHER FUNCTIONS 78 3.1.5.
SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS 79 3.1.6. ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS 79 3.1.7. COURTS
THAT DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO DECIDE ON THE MAIN ACTION 82 3.2.
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES AND OMBUDSMEN 84 3.2.1. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
84 3.2.2. ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL BOARDS 87 3.2.3. ADVISORY BODIES 88
3.2.4. OMBUDSMEN 90 3.3. PRIVATE BODIES 91 3.3.1- PRIVATE DISCIPLINARY
BODIES 91 3.3.2. PRIVATE PROFESSIONAL BODIES 92 3.3.3. MANAGEMENT AND
LABOUR (SOCIAL PARTNERS) 93 4. THE TERM'OF A MEMBER STATE' 93 5. OTHER
FORMS OF PRELIMINARY REFERENCES 97 5.1. OVERVIEW 97 5.2. EURATOM TREATY
97 5.3. JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 97 5.3.1. ARTICLE 68 OF THE EC TREATY
97 5.3.2. ARTICLE 35 OF THE EU TREATY 98 5.3.3. CRITICISM OF THE REGIMES
APPLYING TO JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 99 5.4. CONVENTIONS 100 6.
REFERENCES FROM A NATIONAL COURT THAT MAY NOT MAKE A REFERENCE UNDER
NATIONAL LAW 101 6.1. THE NATIONAL COURT IS PREVENTED FROM SETTING ASIDE
A DISPUTED NATIONAL PROVISION 102 6.2. A SUPERIOR COURT HAS DECLARED THE
CONTESTED NATIONAL PROVISION TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH COMMUNITY LAW 1 04 4.
WHAT QUESTIONS CAN BE REFERRED? 105 1. INTRODUCTION 105 2. ARTICLE
234(L)(A) ON'THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS TREATY' 106 CONTENTS 2.1.
QUESTIONS ON VALIDITY OF THE EC TREATY 106 2.2. WHAT IS COVERED BY'THIS
TREATY'? 107 2.3. QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE EUTREATY 108 2.3.1. OVERVIEW
108 2.3.2. PROVISIONS AMENDING THE EC TREATY, THE ECSC TREATY, OR THE
EURATOM TREATY 109 2.3.3. REFERENCES UNDER ARTICLE 35 OF THE EU TREATY
109 2.3.4. ENHANCED COOPERATION 113 2.3.5. ARTICLE 6(2) OF THE EU
TREATY, ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 113 2.3.6. ARTICLE 7 OF THE EU TREATY, ON
SANCTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH A MEMBER STATES BREACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS 114
2.3.7. THE FINAL PROVISIONS OF THE EUTREARY 114 2.3.8. THE SCHENGEN
AGREEMENT 115 2.3.9. THE TREATY OF LISBON 116 2.4. MIXED JURISDICTION
116 3. ARTICLE 234(L)(B) ON 'THE VALIDITY AND INTERPRETATION OF ACTS OF
THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY AND OF THE ECB' 117 3.1. THE MEANING
OF'THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY' 117 3.2. THE MEANING OF'ACTS' 118
3.2.1. ACTS ADOPTED ON THE BASIS OF THE EC TREATY 118 3.2.2. COMMUNITY
ACTS WHICH REFER TO NON-COMMUNITY ACT 119 3.2.3. THE ACT MUST HAVE BEEN
ADOPTED, BUT NOT NECESSARILY HAVE ENTERED INTO FORCE 121 3.2.4. THE ACT
DOES NOT HAVE DIRECT EFFECT 122 3.2.5. THE ACT HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN THE
SUBJECT OF A PRELIMINARY RULING 122 3.3. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN 'ACTS
OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY' AND AGREEMENTS UNDER INTERNATIONAL
LAW OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE 123 3.3.1. OVERVIEW
123 3.3.2. AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY AND THIRD COUNTRIES 124
3.3.3. MIXED AGREEMENTS 125 3.3.3.1. OVERVIEW*THE FOUR SITUATIONS 125
3.3.3.2. PROVISIONS COVERED BY EXCLUSIVE COMPETENCE 126 3.3.3.3.
PROVISIONS COVERED BY NON-EXCLUSIVE COMPETENCE AND WHERE THE COMMUNITY
HAS LEGISLATED 126 3.3-3.4. PROVISIONS COVERED BY NON-EXCLUSIVE
COMPETENCE AND WHERE THE COMMUNITY HAS NOT LEGISLATED 128 3.3.3.5.
PROVISIONS NOT COVERED BY THE COMMUNITY'S COMPETENCE 130 CONTENTS 33 A.
ACTS OF ORGANS SET UP BY AN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT TO WHICH THE
COMMUNITY IS PARTY 131 3.3.5. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS TO WHICH THE
COMMUNITY IS NOT PARTY, BUT WHICH ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF COMMUNITY LAW
132 3.3.6. INTERNATIONAL LAW THAT DOES NOT QUALIFY AS COMMUNITY LAW, BUT
THAT MAY AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF COMMUNITY LAW 133 3.3.7. INTERNATIONAL
AGREEMENTS TO WHICH THE COMMUNITY IS NOT A PARTY 134 3.3.8. OTHER
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS WHICH GIVE THE COURT OF JUSTICE JURISDICTION TO
INTERPRET 137 3.4. THE MEANING OF'VALIDITY' 137 4. ARTICLE 234(L)(C),
'THE INTERPRETATION OF THE STATUTES OF BODIES ESTABLISHED BY AN ACT OF
THE COUNCIL' 139 5. QUESTIONS WHICH FALL OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION OF THE
COURT OF JUSTICE 140 5.1. OVERVIEW 140 5.2. NATIONAL LAW 140 5.3.
INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY ACTS WHICH DO NOT APPLY IN THE MAIN
PROCEEDINGS 142 5.3.1. OVERVIEW 142 5.3.2. PRELIMINARY RULINGS ON
PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS IN THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 142 5-3.3. APPLICATION OF
COMMUNITY LAW OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF COMMUNITY LAW 143 5.3.4. COMMUNITY
LAW HAS BEEN THE MODEL FOR NATIONAL LAW 145 5-3.5. INTERNAL SITUATIONS
152 5.4. CIRCUMSTANCES ARISING BEFORE ENTRY INTO THE EUROPEANCOMMUNITY
153 5.5. THE FACTS IN THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 155 5.6. APPLICATION OF
COMMUNITY LAW IN THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 156 5. WHEN CAN A REFERENCE FOR A
PRELIMINARY RULING BE MADE? 158 1. OVERVIEW 159 2. GENERAL
CONSIDERATIONS 160 2.1. WHO HAS JURISDICTION TO DECIDE THE RELEVANCE OF
A PRELIMINARY QUESTION? 160 2.2. THE MARGIN OF DISCRETION OF THE
NATIONAL COURTS 161 3. THE REFERRING COURT MUST BE ABLE TO APPLY THE
COURT OF JUSTICE'S RULING TO THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 164 XI CONTENTS 4.
QUESTIONS NOT RELATED TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE MAIN
PROCEEDINGS 172 4.1. THE COURT'S ANSWER WILL ONLY BE RELEVANT FOR FUTURE
CASES 172 4.2. QUESTIONS CONCERNING FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH DIFFER
FROM THOSE IN THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 176 4.3. THE QUESTION IS BASED ON
UNVERIFIED ALTERNATIVE VIEWS OF THE FACTS 180 4.4. THE QUESTION CONCERNS
LEGAL QUESTIONS WHICH CANNOT BE RELEVANT TO THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 181
4.5. THE REFERRING COURT S INTERPRETATION OF THE FACTS OR NATIONAL LAW
IS BEING DISPUTED 183 4.6. THE ANSWER CAN ALREADY BE GIVEN ON THE BASIS
OF NATIONAL LAW 186 4.7. THE QUESTION HAS ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED 190 4.8.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISSUES OF ADMISSIBILITY AND ISSUES OF SUBSTANCE
191 4.9. THE QUESTION CONCERNS A COMMUNITY ACT WHICH WAS NOT IN FORCE AT
THE RELEVANT TIME 194 4.10. RELEVANCE RATIONE TEMPORIS AND NATIONAL LAW
197 4.11. THE QUESTION CONCERNS THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE REFERRING COURT
199 4.12. QUESTIONS CONCERNING LEGISLATION OF OTHER MEMBER STATES 200 5.
CONTRIVED CASES 203 6. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PRELIMINARY
PROCEDURE AND THE INFRINGEMENT PROCEDURE IN ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
EC TREATY 211 7. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE AND
THE PROCEDURE IN ARTICLE 230 CONCERNING ACTIONS FOR ANNULMENT BEFORE THE
COURT OF JUSTICE 213 7.1. THE TWD DOCTRINE 213 7.2. DISCUSSION OF THE
TWD DOCTRINE 219 6. WHEN ARE NATIONAL COURTS OBLIGED TO REFER QUESTIONS?
223 1. THE RIGHT TO REFER AND THE OBLIGATION TO REFER 223 2. NATIONAL
COURTS COVERED BY ARTICLE 234(3) 224 3. EXCEPTIONS TO THE OBLIGATION TO
REFER 230 3.1. THE QUESTION IS NOT RELEVANT 231 3.2. MORE COURTS
HANDLING THE CASE QUALIFY AS 'COURT OI LAST INSTANCE' 232 33. ACTE
ECLAIRE- *A MATERIALLY IDENTICAL QUESTION HAS ALREADY BEEN THE SUBJECT
OF A PRELIMINARY RULING 233 XN CONTENTS 3.4. ACTE CLAIR *THE CORRECT
APPLICATION LEAVES NO SCOPE FOR ANY REASONABLE DOUBT 235 3.4.1. ACTE
CLAIR AND THE CILFITJUDGMENT 235 3.4.2. NATIONAL COURTS' MARGIN OF
DISCRETION UNDER THE ACTE CLAIR DOCTRINE 237 3-4.3. ACTE CLAIR AND THE
WISHES OF THE PARTIES 239 3.4.4. ACTE CLAIR AND THE QUESTION OF
DIFFERENT LANGUAGE VERSIONS 242 3.4.5. ACTE CLAIRAND DISSENTING
JUDGMENTS 244 3.4.6. ACTE CLAIR AND RULINGS BY OTHER NATIONAL COURTS 247
3.4.7. ACTE CLAIR AND CASES PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE 248
3.4.8. ACTE CLAIR AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE AND LEGAL LITERATURE 249
3.4.9. ACTE CLAIR *MEETING THE DEMANDS OF THE TIMES 250 3.5. OTHER FORMS
OF PRELIMINARY REFERENCES 253 3.5-1. EURATOM TREATY 254 3.5-2. JUSTICE
AND HOME AFFAIRS 254 3.5.2.1. ARTICLE 68 OF THE ECTREATY 254 3.5.2.2.
ARTICLE 35 OF THE EU TREATY 256 3.5-3. CONVENTIONS 256 3.6. CASES ON
INTERIM MEASURES 256 3.7. APPLICATION OF COMMUNITY LAW OUTSIDE THE SCOPE
OF COMMUNITY LAW 257 4. THE OBLIGATION OF COURTS OTHER THAN THOSE OF
LAST INSTANCE TO MAKE A REFERENCE 258 4.1. OVERVIEW 258 4.2. REFERENCES
CONCERNING INVALIDITY 259 4.2.1. THE DUTY TO REFER PRIOR TO A FINDING OF
INVALIDITY 259 4.2.2. REFERENCES ON VALIDITY WHERE ACCESS TO REFER IS
RESTRICTED 260 4.2.3. FINDINGS OF INVALIDITY WITHOUT (PRIOR) PRELIMINARY
REFERENCE 262 4.2.4. EVALUATING THE FOTO-FROST DOCTRINE 263 4.3.
DEVIATING FROM THE COURT OF JUSTICE'S INTERPRETATION OF A COMMUNITY
LEGAL ACT 264 4.4. THE DUTY OF LOYAL COOPERATION AND PRELIMINARY
REFERENCES 265 5. CONSEQUENCES OF A NATIONAL COURT DISREGARDING ITS
OBLIGATION TO MAKE A REFERENCE 265 5.1. OVERVIEW 265 5.2. INFRINGEMENT
PROCEEDINGS FOR FAILURE TO REFER 265 5.3. FAILURE TO REFER, VALIDITY OT
NATIONAL JUDGMENTS, AND OBLIGATION TO REOPEN THE CASE-FILE 266 5.4.
DAMAGES FOR FAILURE TO REFER 270 5.5. FAILURE TO REFER AND ARTICLE 6 OF
THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS 271 XLLL CONTENTS 7. WHEN OUGHT
A REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING BE MADE? 273 1 . OVERVIEW 273 2.
DETERMINING THE RELEVANT CRITERIA 274 2.1. THE NEED FOR JUDICIAL
ASSISTANCE 274 2.2. DELAY AND COST 278 2.3. THE WISHES OF THE PARTIES
279 2.4. THE WISH NOT TO OVERLOAD THE COURT OF JUSTICE 283 2.5. SIMILAR
CASES ARE PENDING 284 3. FROM WHICH COURT SHOULD A REFERENCE BE MADE?
288 4. AT WHAT STAGE IN THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS SHOULD A REFERENCE BE MADE?
290 8. THE FORM AND CONTENT OF A REFERENCE 29 5 1. INTRODUCTION 295 2.
THE FORM OF THE REFERENCE 297 3. THE CONTENT OF A REFERENCE 298 3.1. THE
NEED FOR A THOROUGH ORDER FOR REFERENCE 298 3.2. GUIDELINES FOR THE
DRAFTING OF A REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING 303 3.2.1. INTRODUCTION
303 3.2.2. IDENTIFICATION OF THE QUESTION REFERRED 304 3-2.3.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE FACTS 308 3.2.4. INFORMATION ABOUT NATIONAL LAW
312 3.2.5- THE ORDER FOR REFERENCE MUST BE UNDERSTANDABLE WITHOUT THE
NEED TO REFER TO OTHER DOCUMENTS 313 3.2.6. REQUESTING THE APPLICATION
OF THE URGENT PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE IN THE AREA OF FREEDOM,
SECURITY, AND JUSTICE 320 9. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REFERRING COURT
AFTER A REFERENCE HAS BEEN MADE 322 1. THE CASE REMAINS PENDING BEFORE
THE NATIONAL COURT 322 2. APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION TO MAKE A
PRELIMINARY REFERENCE 325 3. INTERIM RELIEF 329 3.1. OVERVIEW 329 3.2.
THE COMPETENCE OF NATIONAL COURTS TO ORDER INTERIM RELIEF 329 3.2.1.
POSSIBLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN NATIONAL LAW AND COMMUNITY LAW 329 3.2.2.
POSSIBLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN DIFFERENT COMMUNITY RULES 330 3.3. THE
CONDITIONS ROR GRANTING INTERIM RELIEF 334 3.3.1. OVERVIEW 334 3-3.2.
DOUBT AS TO VALIDITY 335 XIV CONTENTS 3.3.3. URGENCY 337 3.3.4.
BALANCING THE INTERESTS 338 10. THE PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COURT OF
JUSTICE 34 0 1. OVERVIEW 340 2. NOTIFICATION OF THE DECISION TO MAKE A
REFERENCE 341 3. OBSERVATIONS ON THE PRELIMINARY REFERENCE 343 3.1.
THOSE ENTITLED TO SUBMIT OBSERVATIONS 343 3.2. OBSERVATIONS BY COMMUNITY
INSTITUTIONS AND MEMBER STATES 347 3.3. INFLUENCING THE SCOPE OF THE
PRELIMINARY RULING THROUGH THE PRESENTATION OF OBSERVATIONS 351 3.3.1.
THE PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE DOES NOT HAVE ANY PARTIES STRICTO SENSU
351 3.3.2. THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE PRELIMINARY QUESTION 352 3.3-3.
SUPPLEMENTING OR DEPARTING FROM THE FACTS OF THE REFERENCE 355 3.3.3.1.
THE MAIN RULE 355 3.3.3.2. SUPPLEMENTING THE REFERRING COURT'S
DESCRIPTION OF THE FACTS 356 3.3.3.3. THE FACTS PRESENTED IN THE
REFERENCE ARE BEING DISPUTED 358 3.3-3.3.1. THE DEGREE OF FACT-FINDING
PERFORMED BY THE REFERRING COURT 358 3.3.3.3.2. UNDISPUTED FACTS THAT
ARISE AFTER THE REFERENCE IS MADE 359 3.3.3.3.3. A PARTY CORRECTS
INFORMATION ON THE FACTS AGAINST HIS OWN INTEREST 359 3.3.3.3.4. THOSE
ENTITLED TO PRESENT OBSERVATIONS DISAGREE ON THE CORRECTION OF A FACT
360 3.3.3.3.5. CASES CONCERNING THE VALIDITY OF COMMUNITY RULES 362
3.3.3.3.6. RULES OF EVIDENCE 363 333A. DEPARTING FROM THE REFERRING
COURTS INTERPRETATION OF NATIONAL LAW 365 3.3.3.5. THE COURT OF
JUSTICE'S ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON THE FACTS AND ON NATIONAL LAW 367 4.
THE PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE 369 4.1. REPRESENTATION 369
4.2. LANGUAGE 370 4.3. THE WRITTEN PROCEEDINGS 372 4.3.1. INTRODUCTION
372 4.3.2. DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS REGARDING SUBMISSION OF
OBSERVATIONS 373 XV CONTENTS 4.3.3. CONTENT AND STRUCTURE OF WRITTEN
OBSERVATIONS 374 4.3.4. LENGTH OF THE WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS 377 4.3.5.
THE REPORT FOR THE HEARING 377 4.4. THE ORAL PROCEDURE 378 4.4.1. NOT
ALL CASES ARE HEARD ORALLY 378 4.4.2. SETTING THE DATE FOR THE ORAL
HEARING 379 4.4.3. TIME ALLOWED FOR ADDRESSING THE COURT 379 4.4.4.
CONTENT AND CONDUCT OF THE ORAL HEARING 380 4.4.5. CONSIDERATIONS
PERTAINING TO INTERPRETATION 383 4.4.6. CLOSURE OF THE ORAL PROCEDURE
385 5. EXPEDITED PROCEDURES 385 5.1. OVERVIEW 385 5.2. THE ACCELERATED
PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 104A OF THE COURTS RULES OF PROCEDURE 386
5.2.1. PROCEDURE 386 5.2.2. THE NOTION OF'EXCEPTIONAL URGENCY' 387 5.3.
THE URGENT PROCEDURE IN THE AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY, AND JUSTICE 390
5.3.1. OVERVIEW OF THE URGENT PROCEDURE 390 5.3.2. CONDITIONS FOR THE
APPLICATION OF THE URGENT PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE 391 5.3.3. THE
DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO APPLY THE URGENT PROCEDURE 392 53 A. THE
WRITTEN PROCEDURE 394 5.3.5. THE ORAL OBSERVATIONS IN THE URGENT
PROCEDURE 395 6. GATHERING OF FURTHER EVIDENCE AND REOPENING THE ORAL
PROCEEDINGS 395 11. THE PRELIMINARY RULING 400 1. JUDGMENT OR ORDER? 400
2. REFORMULATING THE QUESTION REFERRED 403 2.1. OVERVIEW 403 2.2. THE
PRELIMINARY QUESTION IS NARROWED DOWN 405 2.3. INCLUSION OF OTHER
COMMUNITY LAW PROVISIONS 408 2.4. ALTERNATIVE ANSWERS 411 2.5.
POTENTIALLY RELEVANT ISSUES THAT DO NOT FORM PART OF THE PRELIMINARY
REFERENCE 413 2.6. QUESTIONS ON THE VALIDITY OF A COMMUNITY PROVISION
418 3. TAILORING THE PRELIMINARY RULING TO THE FACTS OF THE CASE 419
3.1. THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE COURT OF JUSTICE ITSELF MAKES THE LEGAL
CLASSIFICATION OF THE FACTS 419 3.2. THE NATURE OF THE QUESTION 421
CONTENTS 3.3. THE CONTENT AND FORMULATION OF THE PRELIMINARY REFERENCE
423 3.4. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS 424 3-5. THE WORK LOAD OF THE COURT OF
JUSTICE 427 3.6. NEW LEGAL PRINCIPLES 429 12. THE EFFECTS OF THE
PRELIMINARY RULING 431 1. INTRODUCTION 431 2. THE EFFECTS OF A
PRELIMINARY RULING FOR THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 432 2.1. NATIONAL COURTS
DEALING WITH THE CASE 432 2.2. THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 440
3. THE EFFECT OF A PRELIMINARY RULING IN OTHER CASES 441 3.1. OTHER
NATIONAL COURTS 441 3.2. PARTIES IN OTHER NATIONAL PROCEEDINGS,
COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS, AND MEMBER STATES 444 3.3. THE COURT OF JUSTICE
444 4. THE LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OPINIONS OF THE ADVOCATES GENERAL
445 5. THE TEMPORAL EFFECT OF A PRELIMINARY RULING 445 5.1. THE MAIN
RULE 445 5.2. CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH JUSTIFY LIMITING THE TEMPORAL EFFECT
446 5.2.1. OVERVIEW 446 5.2.2. LACK OF LEGAL CLARITY AND GOOD FAITH 447
5.2.2.1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 447 5.2.2.2. THE BEHAVIOUR OF COMMUNITY
INSTITUTIONS 450 5.2.2.3. LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS FOR MEMBER STATES? 453
5.2.3. SERIOUS FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES 454 5.2.4. RELATIONSHIP TO PENDING
PROCEEDINGS 457 5.2.5. TEMPORAL LIMITATION IN CASES CONCERNING THE
VALIDITY OF COMMUNITY MEASURES 457 6. INTERPRETATION AND REVISION OF A
PRELIMINARY RULING 458 13. LITIGATION COSTS AND LEGAL AID 460 1.
LITIGATION COSTS 460 2. LEGAL AID 461 BIBLIOGRAPHY 463 INDEX 475 XVI1 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Alexander, Christian 1975- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)13921478X |
| author_facet | Alexander, Christian 1975- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Alexander, Christian 1975- |
| author_variant | c a ca |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035772844 |
| classification_rvk | PE 760 PE 790 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)698875909 (DE-599)DNB997513209 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035772844</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100527</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">091015s2010 xx m||| 00||| ger d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783161501302</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-16-150130-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)698875909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB997513209</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PE 760</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)135556:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PE 790</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)135560:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexander, Christian</subfield><subfield code="d">1975-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)13921478X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht</subfield><subfield code="b">privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb</subfield><subfield code="c">Christian Alexander</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Tübingen</subfield><subfield code="b">Mohr Siebeck</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXXVIII, 769 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ius privatum</subfield><subfield code="v">147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zugl.: München, Univ., Habil.-Schr., 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unlauterer Wettbewerb</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061842-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kartellrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029788-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gewinnabschöpfung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4253160-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schadensersatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4051927-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gewinnabschöpfung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4253160-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Schadensersatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4051927-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Unlauterer Wettbewerb</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061842-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kartellrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029788-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ius privatum</subfield><subfield code="v">147</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV005424152</subfield><subfield code="9">147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018632505&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018632505&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018632505</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| geographic | Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Deutschland |
| id | DE-604.BV035772844 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-03-31T20:04:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783161501302 |
| language | German |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018632505 |
| oclc_num | 698875909 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 DE-M382 DE-29 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 DE-11 DE-188 DE-521 DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-M382 DE-29 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 DE-11 DE-188 DE-521 DE-739 |
| physical | XXXVIII, 769 S. |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Mohr Siebeck |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Ius privatum |
| series2 | Ius privatum |
| spellingShingle | Alexander, Christian 1975- Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb Ius privatum Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Unlauterer Wettbewerb (DE-588)4061842-0 gnd Kartellrecht (DE-588)4029788-3 gnd Gewinnabschöpfung (DE-588)4253160-3 gnd Schadensersatz (DE-588)4051927-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4061842-0 (DE-588)4029788-3 (DE-588)4253160-3 (DE-588)4051927-2 (DE-588)4011882-4 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb |
| title_auth | Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb |
| title_exact_search | Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb |
| title_full | Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb Christian Alexander |
| title_fullStr | Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb Christian Alexander |
| title_full_unstemmed | Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb Christian Alexander |
| title_short | Schadensersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits- und Kartellrecht |
| title_sort | schadensersatz und abschopfung im lauterkeits und kartellrecht privatrechtliche sanktionsinstrumente zum schutz individueller und uberindividueller interessen im wettbewerb |
| title_sub | privatrechtliche Sanktionsinstrumente zum Schutz individueller und überindividueller Interessen im Wettbewerb |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Unlauterer Wettbewerb (DE-588)4061842-0 gnd Kartellrecht (DE-588)4029788-3 gnd Gewinnabschöpfung (DE-588)4253160-3 gnd Schadensersatz (DE-588)4051927-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Unlauterer Wettbewerb Kartellrecht Gewinnabschöpfung Schadensersatz Deutschland Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018632505&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018632505&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV005424152 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexanderchristian schadensersatzundabschopfungimlauterkeitsundkartellrechtprivatrechtlichesanktionsinstrumentezumschutzindividuellerunduberindividuellerinteressenimwettbewerb |
An UBR ausleihen
Ausleihen an der UBR sind mit eigenem Ausweis möglich.