Weiter zum Inhalt
Bibliothekskatalog
  • Temporäre Merkliste: 0 temporär gemerkt (Ihre Merkliste ist voll)
  • Hilfe
    • Kontakt
    • Suchtipps
    • Erklärvideos
  • Weitere Angebote
    • Anschaffungswunsch
    • Semesterapparat
    • Suchhistorie
    • Fernleihe
  • English
  • Konto

    Konto

    • Ausgeliehen
    • Bestellt
    • Sperren / Gebühren
    • Persönliche Angaben
    • Suchhistorie
  • Log out
  • Login
  • Medien
  • Aufsätze
Erweitert
  • Intuitions of justice and the...
  • Zitieren
  • Als E-Mail versenden
  • Drucken
  • Exportieren
    • Exportieren nach RefWorks
    • Exportieren nach EndNoteWeb
    • Exportieren nach EndNote
    • Exportieren nach BibTeX
    • Exportieren nach Citavi
  • dauerhaft merken
  • temporär merken Aus der Merkliste entfernen
  • Permalink
Export abgeschlossen — 
Buchumschlag
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel:Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert
Von: Paul H. Robinson
Person: Robinson, Paul H.
1948-
Verfasser
aut
Hauptverfasser: Robinson, Paul H. 1948- (VerfasserIn)
Format: Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York Oxford Univ. Press 2013
Schlagworte:
Ethik
Philosophie
Strafjustiz
Öffentliche Meinung
Gerechtigkeit
USA
Criminal justice, Administration of / Philosophy
Criminal justice, Administration of / Public opinion
Criminal justice, Administration of / Moral and ethical aspects
Criminal law / Philosophy
Criminal law / Public opinion
Criminal law / Moral and ethical aspects
Online-Zugang:http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026073902&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
Beschreibung:Includes bibliographical references and index
Beschreibung:XXIII, 559 S. 24 cm
ISBN:9780199917723
Internformat

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002c 4500
001 BV041097426
003 DE-604
005 20140820
007 t|
008 130619s2013 xx |||| 00||| eng d
020 |a 9780199917723  |c (hbk.) No price  |9 978-0-19-991772-3 
035 |a (OCoLC)856805999 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ380137879 
040 |a DE-604  |b ger 
041 0 |a eng 
049 |a DE-12  |a DE-355  |a DE-384  |a DE-19 
082 0 |a 364.01 
084 |a PH 8240  |0 (DE-625)136495:  |2 rvk 
100 1 |a Robinson, Paul H.  |d 1948-  |e Verfasser  |0 (DE-588)139112529  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert  |c Paul H. Robinson 
264 1 |a New York  |b Oxford Univ. Press  |c 2013 
300 |a XXIII, 559 S.  |c 24 cm 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
650 4 |a Ethik 
650 4 |a Philosophie 
650 0 7 |a Strafjustiz  |0 (DE-588)4183472-0  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Ethik  |0 (DE-588)4015602-3  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Öffentliche Meinung  |0 (DE-588)4043152-6  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Gerechtigkeit  |0 (DE-588)4020310-4  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
651 7 |a USA  |0 (DE-588)4078704-7  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
653 |a Criminal justice, Administration of / Philosophy 
653 |a Criminal justice, Administration of / Public opinion 
653 |a Criminal justice, Administration of / Moral and ethical aspects 
653 |a Criminal law / Philosophy 
653 |a Criminal law / Public opinion 
653 |a Criminal law / Moral and ethical aspects 
689 0 0 |a USA  |0 (DE-588)4078704-7  |D g 
689 0 1 |a Strafjustiz  |0 (DE-588)4183472-0  |D s 
689 0 2 |a Ethik  |0 (DE-588)4015602-3  |D s 
689 0 3 |a Gerechtigkeit  |0 (DE-588)4020310-4  |D s 
689 0 4 |a Öffentliche Meinung  |0 (DE-588)4043152-6  |D s 
689 0 |5 DE-604 
856 4 2 |m SWB Datenaustausch  |q application/pdf  |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026073902&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA  |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 
942 1 1 |c 340.09  |e 22/bsb  |f 090511  |g 73 
943 1 |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026073902 

Datensatz im Suchindex

DE-BY-UBR_call_number 303/PH 8240 R658
31/PH 8240 R658
DE-BY-UBR_katkey 5471366
DE-BY-UBR_location UB Handapparat Recht/Wirtschaft Prof. Walter
UB Lesesaal Recht 2
UB Lesesaal Recht 2
DE-BY-UBR_media_number TEMP12487622
069040064103
069039451325
_version_ 1835114513093885952
adam_text IMAGE 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XVII SELECTED ROBINSON BIBLIOGRAPHY XIX LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES XXI PART I) THE NATURE OFJUDGMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE 1. JUDGMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE AS INTUITIONAL AND NUANCED 5 2. JUDGMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE AS A HUMAN UNIVERSAL: AGREEMENTS ON A CORE OF WRONGDOING 18 3. THE ORIGINS OF SHARED INTUITIONS OF JUSTICE 35 4. DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE 63 5. CHANGING PEOPLE S JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 70 PART II | SHOULD THE CRIMINAL LAW CARE WHAT THE LAY PERSON THINKS IS JUST? 6. CURRENT LAW S DEFERENCE TO LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 96 7. CURRENT LAWS CONFLICTS WITH LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 110 8. NORMATIVE CRIME CONTROL: THE UTILITY OF DESERT 141 9. BUILDING MORAL CREDIBILITY AND THE DISUTILITY OF INJUSTICE 176 10. DEVIATIONS FROM EMPIRICAL DESERT 189 11. IMPLICATIONS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND OTHER REFORM 208 PART IN ) THE CONTENT OF LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 12. RULES OF CONDUCT: DOCTRINES OF CRIMINALIZATION 239 13. RULES OF CONDUCT: DOCTRINES OF JUSTIFICATION 277 14. PRINCIPLES OF ADJUDICATION: DOCTRINES OF CULPABILITY 301 15. PRINCIPLES OF ADJUDICATION: DOCTRINES OF EXCUSE 336 IMAGE 2 VIII { TABLE OF CONTENTS 16. PRINCIPLES OF ADJUDICATION: DOCTRINES OF GRADING 362 17. LAW-COMMUNITY AGREEMENT AND CONFLICT, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS 401 PART IV} EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE AS A LAW AND POLICY TOOL 18. EXPLAINING HISTORY: SHIFTING VIEWS OF CRIMINALITY 415 19. TESTING COMPETING THEORIES: BLACKMAIL 439 20. TESTING COMPETING THEORIES: JUSTIFICATION DEFENSES 472 21. GUIDING JUDICIAL DISCRETION: EXTRALEGAL PUNISHMENT FACTORS 493 22. INTUITIONS OF JUSTICE & THE UTILITY OF DESERT 533 TABLE OF CASES 537 TABLE OF MPC 541 INDEX 545 IMAGE 3 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XVII SELECTED ROBINSON BIBLIOGRAPHY XIX LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES XXI PART I} THE NATURE OF JUDGMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE 1. JUDGMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE AS INTUITIONAL AND NUANCED 5 A. JUDGMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE AS INTUITIONAL 5 B. THE COMMON WISDOM: JUDGMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE AS VAGUE OR AT BEST UNSPECIFIC 8 C. THE REALITY: NUANCED JUDGMENTS 12 1. MAKING MANY DISTINCTIONS AMONG CASES 12 2. SMALL FACTUAL DIFFERENCES AMONG CASES CAN PRODUCE SIGNIFICANT LIABILITY DIFFERENCES 13 D. CONCLUSION 16 2. JUDGMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE AS A HUMAN UNIVERSAL: AGREEMENTS ON A CORE OF WRONGDOING 18 A. THE INTUITION THAT SERIOUS WRONGDOING SHOULD BE PUNISHED 19 1. QUESTIONNAIRE STUDIES 19 2. BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS STUDIES 20 3. CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES 21 4. ARE THERE EXCEPTIONS? 22 B. INTUITIONS ON THE RELATIVE SERIOUSNESS OF WRONGDOING 23 1. PREVIOUS DOMESTIC STUDIES 23 2. CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES 26 C. TESTING THE LIMITS OF AGREEMENT 28 1. STUDY 1: IN-PERSON TESTING 29 2. STUDY 2: INTERNET TESTING 32 D. CONCLUSION 34 3. THE ORIGINS OF SHARED INTUITIONS OF JUSTICE 35 A. AN EVOLUTIONARY EXPLANATION FOR INTUITIONS OF JUSTICE 36 B. EMPIRICAL SUPPORT FOR AN EVOLUTIONARY EXPLANATION 41 1. ANIMAL STUDIES EVIDENCE 41 2. BRAIN SCIENCE EVIDENCE 44 3. CHILD DEVELOPMENT EVIDENCE 48 4. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE 54 IMAGE 4 X { DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS C. ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS: GENERAL SOCIAL LEARNING AND EFFICIENT NORMS 56 1. SPONTANEOUS SOCIAL LEARNING 56 2. ACCUMULATED SOCIAL LEARNING 58 D. CONCLUSION 62 4. DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT JUSTICE 63 A. APPARENT DISAGREEMENTS AMONG INTUITIONS OF JUSTICE 63 B. TRUE DISAGREEMENTS AMONG INTUITIONS OF JUSTICE: STUDIES 3 AND 4 65 1. METHOD: STUDIES 3 AND 4 65 2. STUDY 3 RESULTS 66 3. STUDY 4 RESULTS 67 C. CONCLUSION 68 5. CHANGING PEOPLE S JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 70 A. PROPOSALS TO CHANGE INTUITIONS OF WRONGDOING AND BLAMEWORTHINESS 70 B. DIFFICULTIES IN CHANGING INTUITIONS 71 C. WHICH INTUITIONS OF JUSTICE CAN BE CHANGED AND WHICH CANNOT? 74 D. HOW CAN JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE BE CHANGED? 77 1. PUBLIC EDUCATION TO MANIPULATE THE ANALOGY TO CORE WRONGS 77 2. INTERNALIZATION OF GROUP BELIEFS 79 E. CRITICISMS OF CLAIMS REGARDING AGREEMENT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS 82 1. WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE CORE ? 82 2. POSSIBLE POINTS OF DISAGREEMENT WITH BKH 87 3. CONCLUSION 93 L PART II} SHOULD THE CRIMINAL LAW CARE WHAT THE LAY PERSON THINKS IS JUST? 6. CURRENT LAW S DEFERENCE TO LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 97 A. RULES 97 1. RECOGNIZING EXCUSE DEFENSES 98 2. FAILING TO TAKE ACCOUNT OF FACTORS RELEVANT TO COERCIVE CRIME-CONTROL PRINCIPLES 100 3. CREATING A FALSE IMPRESSION THAT RESULTING HARM IS SIGNIFICANT BY INCLUDING RESULT ELEMENTS IN OFFENSE DEFINITIONS 101 B. STANDARDS 103 1. EXPLICIT RELIANCE UPON LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 104 2. VAGUE STANDARDS 104 3. RULES REQUIRING JURY SPECULATION 106 C. EXPLANATIONS FOR DEFERENCE TO LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 108 7. CURRENT LAW S CONFLICTS WITH LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 110 A. COMMON AND RECURRING MINOR CONFLICTS 110 B. MODERN COERCIVE CRIME-CONTROL RULES IN CONFLICT WITH DESERT 111 IMAGE 5 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS } XI 1. THREE STRIKES AND OTHER HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTES 112 2. DRUG OFFENSE PENALTIES 113 3. ADULT PROSECUTION OF JUVENILES 114 4. ABOLITION OR NARROWING OF THE INSANITY DEFENSE 115 5. STRICT LIABILITY 117 6. FELONY MURDER 119 7. CRIMINALIZATION OF REGULATORY VIOLATIONS 119 C. TESTING THE PERCEIVED JUSTICE OF MODERN CRIME-CONTROL DOCTRINES 120 1. MILESTONE AND CRIME-CONTROL SCENARIOS 121 2. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 123 3. STUDY RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 124 D. HOW CAN A DEMOCRATIC PROCESS PRODUCE LIABILITY RULES THAT THE COMMUNITY SEES AS UNJUST? 128 1. MEDIA OMISSION OF FACTS VITAL TO UNDERSTANDING SENTENCES 130 2. MEDIA COVERAGE OF GENERAL CRIME ISSUES; GOVERNMENT AS INFORMATION SOURCE 131 3. ASSUMING HEADLINE CRIMES TO BE PARADIGMATIC 134 4. PUBLIC FEAR 136 5. NEXT-ELECTION VULNERABILITY 138 E. CONCLUSION 139 NORMATIVE CRIME CONTROL: THE UTILITY OF DESERT 141 A. LIMITATIONS ON THE TRADITIONAL COERCIVE CRIME-CONTROL PRINCIPLES: DETERRENCE, INCAPACITATION, AND REHABILITATION 142 1. DETERRENCE 144 2. REHABILITATION 148 3. INCAPACITATION OF THE DANGEROUS 149 B. NORMATIVE CRIME CONTROL: WHY PEOPLE OBEY THE LAW 152 1. HARNESSING THE POWER AND EFFICIENCY OF NORMATIVE SOCIAL INFLUENCE THROUGH STIGMATIZATION 154 2. AVOIDING VIGILANTISM 155 3. AVOIDING THE RESISTANCE AND SUBVERSION PRODUCED BY A SYSTEM THAT IS SEEN AS DOING INJUSTICE OR FAILING TO DO JUSTICE 156 4. HAVING A ROLE IN SHAPING SOCIETAL NORMS: THE PERSUASIVE POWER OF THE LAW 161 5. GAINING COMPLIANCE AN BORDERLINE CASES 162 C. DEONTOLOGICAL DESERT AND EMPIRICAL DESERT 163 1. TWO CONCEPTIONS OF DESERT 164 2. WHERE THE TWO CONCEPTIONS AGREE 165 3. WHERE THE TWO CONCEPTIONS DISAGREE 166 D. CRITICISMS OF EMPIRICAL DESERT AS A DISTRIBUTIVE PRINCIPLE 167 1. NOTIONS OF DESERT AS HOPELESSLY VAGUE 167 2. HOPELESS DISAGREEMENT AS TO NOTIONS OF DESERT 168 IMAGE 6 XII { DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. PEOPLE INTUITIVELY ASSESS PUNISHMENT ACCORDING TO DETERRENCE OR INCAPACITATION 169 4. EMPIRICAL DESERT AS INEVITABLY DRACONIAN 171 5. EMPIRICAL DESERT AS POTENTIALLY IMMORAL 172 E. CONCLUSION 174 9. BUILDING MORAL CREDIBILITY AND THE DISUTILITY OF INJUSTICE 176 A. RECENT EMPIRICAL STUDIES ON THE DISUTILITY OF INJUSTICE 177 1. STUDY A DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 177 2. STUDY A RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 179 3. STUDY B DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 181 4. STUDY B RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 182 B. PREVIOUS STUDIES 184 C. CONCLUSION 188 10. DEVIATIONS FROM EMPIRICAL DESERT 189 A. INEVITABLE DEVIATIONS: THE PROBLEM OF MORAL DIVISIONS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY 190 B. RIGHT-SPIRITED DEVIATIONS: PROMOTING JUSTICE IN A COMPLEX WORLD 191 C. JUSTIFYING DEVIATIONS FROM EMPIRICAL DESERT 193 1. DEVIATIONS TO MORE EFFECTIVELY CONTROL CRIME 194 2. DEVIATIONS TO ADVANCE INTERESTS OTHER THAN CRIME CONTROL 196 D. DEVIATIONS TO CHANGE SOCIAL NORMS: ALTERING EMPIRICAL DESERT 196 1. THE IMPORTANCE OF MORAL CREDIBILITY TO SOCIAL REFORMERS 197 2. LIMITATIONS ON AND TECHNIQUES FOR CHANGING NORMS 199 3. MANAGING BENEFITS VERSUS RISKS OF REFORM PROGRAMS: PERSUASION VERSUS CONTEMPT 200 E. DEVIATION TO PROMOTE LEGITIMACY 202 1. POINTS OF TENSION 203 2. RESOLVING THE CONFLICT 205 11. IMPLICATIONS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND OTHER REFORM 208 A. A CENTRAL CONCERN FOR DOING JUSTICE 208 B. ABOLITION OF PUNISHMENT AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE 209 C. REFORMS TO EXISTING DEVIATIONS FROM EMPIRICAL DESERT 215 1. CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORMS 215 2. EMPLOYING CIVIL RATHER THAN CRIMINAL PROCESSES 216 D. SHARPENING THE CRIMINAL-CIVIL DISTINCTION 218 /. WHY HAVE TWO LEGAL SYSTEMS?: THE LAYPERSON VIEW OF THE CRIMINAL-CIVIL DISTINCTION 218 2. THE DETRIMENTAL EFFECT OF BLURRING THE CRIMINAL-CIVIL DISTINCTION 219 E. EXPANDING THE REACH OF BLAMELESSNESS: EXERCISING MERCY 222 IMAGE 7 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS } XIII 1. THE NATURE OF MERCY 222 2. LAY INTUITIONS ON XPFS AND THE PROBLEM OF UNDERMINING THE LAW S MORAL CREDIBILITY 223 3. DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT XPFS AND THE PROBLEM OF DISPARITY IN APPLICATION 224 F. BREAKING NEW GROUND: ARE WE RESPONSIBLE FOR WHO WE ARE? 226 1. TRADITIONAL EXCUSE THEORY AND THE INADEQUACY OF A BUT FOR CAUSE AS AN EXCUSE: JUDGE BAZELON IN BRAWNER AND ALEXANDER 227 2. COERCIVE INDOCTRINATION UNDER NORMATIVE CRIME CONTROL: THE CASE OF POW RICHARD TENNESON 230 3. TESTING THE LIMITS OF A COERCIVE INDOCTRINATION OR A ROTTEN SOCIAL BACKGROUND EXCUSE: THE CASE OF ALEX CABARGA 231 4. ROTTEN SOCIAL BACKGROUND AND EMPIRICAL DESERT 234 PART IN} IHE CONTENT OF LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 12. RULES OF CONDUCT: DOCTRINES OF CRIMINALIZATION 239 A. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN TESTING LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE 240 B. AN ILLUSTRATION: TESTING THE OBJECTIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR ATTEMPT LIABILITY 247 C. DESISTANCE, RENUNCIATION, AND UNDOING IN ATTEMPT 253 D. CREATING A CRIMINAL RISK 257 E. OBJECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF COMPLICITY 261 F. OMISSION LIABILITY 268 G. SECONDARY PROHIBITIONS: A SUMMARY 275 13. RULES OF CONDUCT: DOCTRINES OF JUSTIFICATION 277 A. USE OF DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE 278 B. USE OF FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PROPERTY 287 C. CITIZENS LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY 293 D. JUSTIFICATION DEFENSES: A SUMMARY 299 14. PRINCIPLES OF ADJUDICATION: DOCTRINES OF CULPABILITY 301 A. OFFENSE CULPABILITY REQUIREMENTS AND MISTAKE/ACCIDENT DEFENSES 302 B. CULPABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLICITY 310 C. VOLUNTARY INTOXICATION 318 D. INDIVIDUALIZATION OF THE OBJECTIVE STANDARD OF NEGLIGENCE 327 E. SUMMARY 334 15. PRINCIPLES OF ADJUDICATION: DOCTRINES OF EXCUSE 336 A. INSANITY 336 B. IMMATURITY AND INVOLUNTARY INTOXICATION 346 C. DURESS AND ENTRAPMENT DEFENSES 353 D. SUMMARY 360 IMAGE 8 XIV { DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 16. PRINCIPLES OF ADJUDICATION: DOCTRINES OF GRADING 362 A. GRADING DISTINCTIONS AMONG AND WITHIN OFFENSES 362 B. THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE: SEXUAL OFFENSES 369 C. THE CULPABILITY OF THE PERSON: FELONY MURDER 377 D. THE STRENGTH OF THE PERSON S CONNECTION WITH THE PROHIBITED RESULT: CAUSATION REQUIREMENTS 385 E. PUNISHMENT FOR MULTIPLE OFFENSES 393 F. SUMMARY 399 1 7. LAW-COMMUNITY AGREEMENT AND CONFLICT, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS 401 A. LAW AND COMMUNITY COMMONLY AGREE 402 B. LAW AND COMMUNITY ALSO COMMONLY DISAGREE 402 C. BINARY VERSUS CATEGORY JUDGMENTS: LEGALITY AND NORMATIVE POWER IN CODE DRAFTING 406 D. CRIMINAL LIABILITY WITHOUT PUNISHMENT 408 E. THE JURY AS A RESOLVER OF LAW-COMMUNITY CONFLICTS 410 PART IV} EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF LAY JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE AS A LAW AND POLICY TOOL 18. EXPLAINING HISTORY: SHIFTING VIEWS OF CRIMINALITY 415 A. THEORIES FOR A PATTERN OF CRIMINALIZATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMMON LAW AND MODERN CODES 416 1. A DOCTRINAL SHIFT IN VIEWS OF CRIMINALITY FROM COMMON LAW TO MODERN CODES? 416 2. OBJECTIVIST VS. SUBJECTIVIST (TRADITIONALIST VS. MODERNIST) VIEWS OF CRIMINALITY 419 3. TESTABLE EMPIRICAL ISSUES 421 B. IDENTIFYING OBJECTIVIST VERSUS SUBJECTIVIST VIEWS OF CRIMINALITY 421 C. THE RESULTS 423 1. ISSUES OF OFFENSE GRADING 423 2. ISSUES OF OFFENSE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 425 3. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE PATTERNS OF INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS 428 D. IMPLICATIONS 429 E. CONCLUSION 434 1. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 434 2. IMPLICATIONS FOR EXISTING CRIMINAL LAW 435 19. TESTING COMPETING THEORIES: BLACKMAIL 439 A. COMPETING THEORIES OF BLACKMAIL 440 1. THEORIES OF BLACKMAIL AS A CRIME AGAINST THE THREAT RECIPIENT 441 2. THEORIES OF BLACKMAIL AS A CRIME AGAINST THIRD PARTIES 443 IMAGE 9 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS } XV 3. THEORIES OF BLACKMAIL AS A SOCIETAL HARM 447 4. THEORIES OF BLACKMAIL AS NON-CRIME: THE ABOLITIONIST POSITION 449 B. STATUTORY APPROACHES 450 C. TESTING COMMUNITY VIEWS 453 7. DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 453 2. THEORY PREDICTIONS 455 3. STATUTORY LIABILITY PATTERNS 462 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 464 D. CONCLUSION 470 20. TESTING COMPETING THEORIES: JUSTIFICATION DEFENSES 472 A. COMPETING THEORIES OF JUSTIFICATION 473 /. UNKNOWINGLY JUSTIFIED ACTOR 474 2. MISTAKE AS TO A JUSTIFICATION 475 B. LIABILITY PREDICTIONS 477 1. CONTRAST CASES 478 2. TEST CASES 480 C. LIABILITY RESULTS 484 7. CONTRAST CASES 484 2. CASES FOR WHICH THE THEORIES OF JUSTIFICATION HAVE DIFFERENT PREDICTIONS 486 D. IMPLICATIONS FOR CRIMINAL LAW REFORM 487 /. FORMULATION AND GRADING OFFENSES 487 2. FORMULATION OF DEFENSES 488 3. REFORM OF ACQUITTAL VERDICT FORMS 490 E. CONCLUSIONS 492 21. GUIDING JUDICIAL DISCRETION: EXTRALEGAL PUNISHMENT FACTORS 493 A. EXTRALEGAL PUNISHMENT FACTORS 494 /. OFFENDER REACTION TO THE OFFENSE: REMORSE, APOLOGY, AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF GUILT 495 2. VICTIM OR PUBLIC REACTION TO THE OFFENSE (UNRELATED TO DESERT): VICTIM FORGIVENESS; DEMAND FOR MORE PUNISHMENT, OR FOR LESS; PUBLIC- OUTRAGE 498 3. OFFENDER STATUS OR CHARACTERISTICS ( UNRELATED TO COMMISSION OF THE OFFENSE): PAST GOOD, OR BAD, CHARACTER OR DEEDS; REHABILITATION; SPECIAL TALENTS 501 4. SUFFERING APART FROM OFFICIAL PUNISHMENT: SPECIAL HARDSHIP FROM OFFENSE OR FROM PUNISHMENT, FOR OFFENDER OR FAMILY OR OTHERS; PAYMENT OF CIVIL COMPENSATION 506 B. A STUDY OF LAY INTUITIONS OF EXTRALEGAL PUNISHMENT FACTORS 512 1. METHODOLOGY 513 2. METHODOLOGICAL NOTE: A SHIFT FROM IMPLICIT TO EXPLICIT RANKING 517 IMAGE 10 XVI { DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. SUPPORT FOR ADJUSTING PUNISHMENT IN LIGHT OF EXTRALEGAL PUNISHMENT FACTORS 518 4. EFFECT OF BASELINE OFFENSE ON XPF ADJUSTMENTS TO PUNISHMENTS 521 5. RELATIVE RELATION AMONG XPFS BY POPULARITY 522 6. DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES 525 7. SUMMARY OF STUDY CONCLUSIONS 528 C. IMPLICATIONS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE RULES AND PRACTICES 529 1. DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT XPFS AND THE PROBLEM OF DISPARITY IN APPLICATION 529 2. STRONG SUPPORT FOR, OR OPPOSITION TO, AN XPF AND THE PROBLEM OF UNDERMINING THE LAW S MORAL CREDIBILITY 531 D. CONCLUSION 532 22. INTUITIONS OF JUSTICE & IHE UTILITY OF DESERT 533 TABLE OF CASES 537 TABLE OF MPC 541 INDEX 545
any_adam_object 1
author Robinson, Paul H. 1948-
author_GND (DE-588)139112529
author_facet Robinson, Paul H. 1948-
author_role aut
author_sort Robinson, Paul H. 1948-
author_variant p h r ph phr
building Verbundindex
bvnumber BV041097426
classification_rvk PH 8240
ctrlnum (OCoLC)856805999
(DE-599)BSZ380137879
dewey-full 364.01
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-ones 364 - Criminology
dewey-raw 364.01
dewey-search 364.01
dewey-sort 3364.01
dewey-tens 360 - Social problems and services; associations
discipline Rechtswissenschaft
format Book
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02190nam a22005412c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041097426</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20140820 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130619s2013 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780199917723</subfield><subfield code="c">(hbk.) No price</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-991772-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)856805999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ380137879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">364.01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 8240</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136495:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robinson, Paul H.</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)139112529</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert</subfield><subfield code="c">Paul H. Robinson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIII, 559 S.</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafjustiz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4183472-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Öffentliche Meinung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4043152-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020310-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Criminal justice, Administration of / Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Criminal justice, Administration of / Public opinion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Criminal justice, Administration of / Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Criminal law / Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Criminal law / Public opinion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Criminal law / Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Strafjustiz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4183472-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020310-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Öffentliche Meinung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4043152-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&amp;doc_library=BVB01&amp;local_base=BVB01&amp;doc_number=026073902&amp;sequence=000001&amp;line_number=0001&amp;func_code=DB_RECORDS&amp;service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026073902</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
geographic USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd
geographic_facet USA
id DE-604.BV041097426
illustrated Not Illustrated
indexdate 2024-12-20T16:30:42Z
institution BVB
isbn 9780199917723
language English
oai_aleph_id oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026073902
oclc_num 856805999
open_access_boolean
owner DE-12
DE-355
DE-BY-UBR
DE-384
DE-19
DE-BY-UBM
owner_facet DE-12
DE-355
DE-BY-UBR
DE-384
DE-19
DE-BY-UBM
physical XXIII, 559 S. 24 cm
publishDate 2013
publishDateSearch 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Oxford Univ. Press
record_format marc
spellingShingle Robinson, Paul H. 1948-
Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert
Ethik
Philosophie
Strafjustiz (DE-588)4183472-0 gnd
Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd
Öffentliche Meinung (DE-588)4043152-6 gnd
Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4020310-4 gnd
subject_GND (DE-588)4183472-0
(DE-588)4015602-3
(DE-588)4043152-6
(DE-588)4020310-4
(DE-588)4078704-7
title Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert
title_auth Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert
title_exact_search Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert
title_full Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert Paul H. Robinson
title_fullStr Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert Paul H. Robinson
title_full_unstemmed Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert Paul H. Robinson
title_short Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert
title_sort intuitions of justice and the utility of desert
topic Ethik
Philosophie
Strafjustiz (DE-588)4183472-0 gnd
Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd
Öffentliche Meinung (DE-588)4043152-6 gnd
Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4020310-4 gnd
topic_facet Ethik
Philosophie
Strafjustiz
Öffentliche Meinung
Gerechtigkeit
USA
url http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026073902&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonpaulh intuitionsofjusticeandtheutilityofdesert
  • Verfügbarkeit

‌

Per Ortsleihe bestellen Per Ortsleihe bestellen Inhaltsverzeichnis
An UBR ausleihen
Ausleihen an der UBR sind mit eigenem Ausweis möglich.
  • Impressum
  • Datenschutz
  • Barrierefreiheit
  • Kontakt