Weiter zum Inhalt
Bibliothekskatalog
  • Temporäre Merkliste: 0 temporär gemerkt (Ihre Merkliste ist voll)
  • Hilfe
    • Kontakt
    • Suchtipps
    • Erklärvideos
  • Weitere Angebote
    • Anschaffungswunsch
    • Semesterapparat
    • Suchhistorie
    • Fernleihe
  • English
  • Konto

    Konto

    • Ausgeliehen
    • Bestellt
    • Sperren / Gebühren
    • Persönliche Angaben
    • Suchhistorie
  • Log out
  • Login
  • Medien
  • Aufsätze
Erweitert
  • Fault-tracing: against Quine-D...
  • Zitieren
  • Als E-Mail versenden
  • Drucken
  • Exportieren
    • Exportieren nach RefWorks
    • Exportieren nach EndNoteWeb
    • Exportieren nach EndNote
    • Exportieren nach BibTeX
    • Exportieren nach Citavi
  • dauerhaft merken
  • temporär merken Aus der Merkliste entfernen
  • Permalink
Buchumschlag
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel:Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem
a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification
Von: Sam Mitchell
Person: Mitchell, Sam
Verfasser
aut
Hauptverfasser: Mitchell, Sam (VerfasserIn)
Format: Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Berlin De Gruyter [2020]
Schriftenreihe:Epistemic studies volume 40
Schlagworte:
Verifikation
Objektivität
Falsifikation
Wissenschaft
Hypothese
Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung
Forschung
Duhem-Quine-These
Erkenntnistheorie
Hardback
Fachpublikum/ Wissenschaft
PHI004000
Quine-Duhem
confirmation
scientific justification
scientific objectivity
PHI016000: PHI016000 PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern
SCI075000: SCI075000 SCIENCE / Philosophy & Social Aspects
HPCF: Western philosophy, from c 1900 -
HPK: Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge
PDA: Philosophy of science
Quine
Duhem
Wissenschaftliche Objektivität
Wissenschaftliche Rechtfertigung
1526: Hardcover, Softcover / Philosophie/20., 21. Jahrhundert
Online-Zugang:http://www.degruyter.com/search?f_0=isbnissn&q_0=9783110684995&searchTitles=true
http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032334461&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
Beschreibung:VIII, 224 Seiten Diagramme 23 cm x 15.5 cm
ISBN:9783110684995
3110684993
Internformat

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000008cb4500
001 BV046925349
003 DE-604
005 20201104
007 t|
008 201005s2020 gw |||| |||| 00||| eng d
015 |a 19,N46  |2 dnb 
016 7 |a 1199214337  |2 DE-101 
020 |a 9783110684995  |c : EUR 84.95 (DE) (freier Preis), EUR 84.95 (AT) (freier Preis)  |9 978-3-11-068499-5 
020 |a 3110684993  |9 3-11-068499-3 
024 3 |a 9783110684995 
035 |a (OCoLC)1220884973 
035 |a (DE-599)DNB1199214337 
040 |a DE-604  |b ger  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a gw  |c XA-DE-BE 
049 |a DE-12 
084 |a 100  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Mitchell, Sam  |e Verfasser  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem  |b a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification  |c Sam Mitchell 
264 1 |a Berlin  |b De Gruyter  |c [2020] 
300 |a VIII, 224 Seiten  |b Diagramme  |c 23 cm x 15.5 cm 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Epistemic studies  |v volume 40 
650 0 7 |a Verifikation  |0 (DE-588)4135577-5  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Objektivität  |0 (DE-588)4172310-7  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Falsifikation  |0 (DE-588)4197286-7  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Wissenschaft  |0 (DE-588)4066562-8  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Hypothese  |0 (DE-588)4161152-4  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung  |0 (DE-588)4315996-5  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Forschung  |0 (DE-588)4017894-8  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Duhem-Quine-These  |0 (DE-588)4426773-3  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Erkenntnistheorie  |0 (DE-588)4070914-0  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
653 |a Hardback 
653 |a Fachpublikum/ Wissenschaft 
653 |a Fachpublikum/ Wissenschaft 
653 |a PHI004000 
653 |a Quine-Duhem 
653 |a confirmation 
653 |a scientific justification 
653 |a scientific objectivity 
653 |a PHI016000: PHI016000 PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern 
653 |a SCI075000: SCI075000 SCIENCE / Philosophy & Social Aspects 
653 |a HPCF: Western philosophy, from c 1900 - 
653 |a HPK: Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge 
653 |a PDA: Philosophy of science 
653 |a Quine 
653 |a Duhem 
653 |a Wissenschaftliche Objektivität 
653 |a Wissenschaftliche Rechtfertigung 
653 |a PHI004000 
653 |a 1526: Hardcover, Softcover / Philosophie/20., 21. Jahrhundert 
689 0 0 |a Wissenschaft  |0 (DE-588)4066562-8  |D s 
689 0 1 |a Forschung  |0 (DE-588)4017894-8  |D s 
689 0 2 |a Hypothese  |0 (DE-588)4161152-4  |D s 
689 0 3 |a Objektivität  |0 (DE-588)4172310-7  |D s 
689 0 4 |a Erkenntnistheorie  |0 (DE-588)4070914-0  |D s 
689 0 |5 DE-604 
689 1 0 |a Hypothese  |0 (DE-588)4161152-4  |D s 
689 1 1 |a Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung  |0 (DE-588)4315996-5  |D s 
689 1 2 |a Falsifikation  |0 (DE-588)4197286-7  |D s 
689 1 3 |a Verifikation  |0 (DE-588)4135577-5  |D s 
689 1 4 |a Objektivität  |0 (DE-588)4172310-7  |D s 
689 1 5 |a Erkenntnistheorie  |0 (DE-588)4070914-0  |D s 
689 1 |5 DE-604 
689 2 0 |a Duhem-Quine-These  |0 (DE-588)4426773-3  |D s 
689 2 |5 DE-604 
710 2 |a Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG  |0 (DE-588)10095502-2  |4 pbl 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Online-Ausgabe, epub  |z 978-3-11-068509-1 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Online-Ausgabe, pdf  |z 978-3-11-068504-6 
830 0 |a Epistemic studies  |v volume 40  |w (DE-604)BV044407301  |9 40 
856 4 2 |m X:MVB  |u http://www.degruyter.com/search?f_0=isbnissn&q_0=9783110684995&searchTitles=true 
856 4 2 |m DNB Datenaustausch  |q application/pdf  |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032334461&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA  |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 
943 1 |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032334461 

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_ 1819293536010371072
adam_text CONTENTS INTRODUCTION * 1 1 THE QUINE-DUHEM HYPOTHESIS * 1 2 INDEPENDENT CONFIRMATION * 6 3 THE KEY THESES OF CONSTRUCTIVISM * 12 4 OUTLINE OF THE COURSE OF THIS BOOK * 18 1 AN EXAMPLE OF A CONSTRUCTIVE TREE IN DARWIN * 21 1.1 ISOLATED ALPINE POPULATIONS HAVE A RECENT COMMON ANCESTOR * 21 1.2 EXPLANATION OF THE EXAMPLE * 26 1.2.1 THE ROOT NODE -----26 1.2.2 CONFIRMING THE AUXILIARIES * 27 1.2.3 THE LEAVES * 28 1.3 CAN THIS EXAMPLE BE MADE COMPLETE? * 33 1.4 WHY ARE EXAMPLES OF A CONSTRUCTIVE TREE NOT MORE COMMON? ----- 35 1.5 WHEN SHOULD WE EXPECT TO SEE SCIENTISTS (AND OTHERS) GIVING CONSTRUCTIVE TREES, OR PARTS OF THEM? * 36 2 THE MEANING OF INDEPENDENT CONFIRMATION * 39 2.1 OBSERVATION INDEPENDENCE AND HYPOTHESIS INDEPENDENCE * 40 2.2 VIOLATIONS OF OBSERVATION INDEPENDENCE: EXAMPLES * 41 2.3 VIOLATIONS OF HYPOTHESIS INDEPENDENCE: EXAMPLES * 44 2.4 HOW TO CONFIRM AUXILIARIES INDEPENDENTLY USING BAYESIANISM * 47 2.5 CONSTRUCTIVE TREES GIVE THE RELEVANT BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE FOR A JUSTIFICATION * 49 2.6 CYCLES AND WHY THEY ARE FORBIDDEN * 51 2.7 EXAMPLES OF CYCLES IN THE LITERATURE * 53 2.8 AN EXAMPLE: NEWTON * S ORIGINAL IDEA FOR ABSOLUTE VELOCITY * 55 3 HOW TO CONFIRM HYPOTHESES ABOUT UNOBSERVABLES * 59 3.1 GLYMOUR * S IDEA * 61 3.2 ADAPTING GLYMOUR * S IDEA * 63 3.3 A TOY EXAMPLE * 64 3.4 VARIOUS OBJECTIONS AND REPLIES * 68 3.4.1 CONSTRUCTIVISM IS CONTRIVED * 68 VI * CONTENTS 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 THE OBJECTION FROM VAN FRAASSEN S WORK -----69 CONSTRUCTIVISM IS TOO PERMISSIVE -----69 THE EXAMPLE TAKES FOR GRANTED MANY HYPOTHESES, SO IT ISN T REALLY A REAL CONFIRMATION AT ALL * 70 3.4.5 3.4.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 THESE INITIAL STEPS ARE A VERY POOR JUSTIFICATION ----- 71 JUSTIFICATION ONLY BEGINS HOLISTICALLY ----- 71 THE SCALES OF JUSTICE ----- 72 APPARATUS ----- 73 THE THEORY ----- 74 LIST OF OBSERVABLES ----- 75 CONFIRMING THAT TWO INTERSECTIONS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE FULCRUM ----- 76 3.10 3.11 CONFIRMING TWO BODIES HAVE IDENTICAL WEIGHT ----- 77 ESTABLISHING A SCALE: INTEGER MULTIPLES AND FRACTIONS OF WEIGHT -----78 3.12 3.13 CONFIRMING A SCALE OF LENGTH ----- 80 OVERVIEW OF THE BALANCE * 81 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 FAULT TRACING -----83 A NASTY SURPRISE -----83 WHAT MIGHT HAVE GONE WRONG? ----- 83 INDEPENDENTLY CONFIRMING THAT THAT IS WHAT WENT WRONG * 85 IN SOME CASES, THE OBSERVATIONS PREVENT A CHOICE OF BLAME -----87 APPENDIX: WHAT ABOUT MERCURY? ----- 89 THE CONSTRUCTIVE ANSWER TO THE EXAMPLE * 90 5 5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2 EXAMPLES OF FAULT TRACING * 93 FIRST EXAMPLE: POLARIZED SUNGLASSES * 93 FIRST STAGE: OBSERVATIONS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH BELIEFS ----- 94 SECOND STAGE: MAKE AN INTELLIGENT GUESS AT WHERE THE FAULT LIES ----- 95 5.1.3 5.1.4 5.2 THIRD STAGE: FORMULATE A THEORY THAT AVOIDS CONFLICT * 96 FOURTH STAGE: CONFIRMING THE DIAGNOSIS * 97 SECOND EXAMPLE: COMPTON * S DESCRIPTION OF FAULT TRACING IN MEASURING X-RAY WAVELENGTHS * 97 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 BACKGROUND ----- 97 BRAGG DIFFRACTION ----- 98 THE PROBLEM, AND INITIAL ATTEMPTS AT A SOLUTION * 99 TRYING TO DISCOVER THE SOURCE OF THE ERROR * 100 CONTENTS * VII 5.2.5 RESTORING AGREEMENT WITH THE DATA * 103 5.3 THIRD EXAMPLE: TRACING ERRORS TO THE EXPERIMENTER * 104 5.3.1 PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION * 104 5.3.2 AN INTERESTING AND SIMPLE EXAMPLE ----- 104 5.3.3 TRACING THE FAULT * 106 5.4 FAULT-TRACING IN NATURAL SCIENCE * 107 5.4.1 SYNOPSIS OF FAULT-TRACING ----- 107 5.4.2 CLOSING WORDS: THE REPLY TO REDUCTIONISM AND VERIFICATIONISM * 108 6 CHANG * S PARADOX * 111 6.1 CHANG * S PARADOX AND ITS SOLUTION * 111 6.1.1 THE PARADOX * 111 6.1.2 INITIAL STEPS IN MEASURING TEMPERATURE * 113 6.1.3 ESTABLISH THAT MERCURY THERMOMETERS MEASURE TEMPERATURES * 114 6.2 ORDINAL AND LINEAR SCALES * 117 6.2.1 THE COURSE OF EXPERIMENTS ----- 118 6.2.2 WHAT MUST BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED? * 120 7 ESCAPING CYCLES OF CONFIRMATION ----- 125 7.1 A CYCLE IN COPERNICANISM * 126 7.1.1 COPERNICUS HAD INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTIVE EVIDENCE FOR EACH OF THE THREE HYPOTHESES * 129 7.1.2 AN INDEPENDENT JUSTIFICATION FOR HELIOCENTRISM * 133 7.1.3 AMPLIFYING JUSTIFICATIONS ----- 133 7.2 OTHER WAYS THAT COPERNICANISM ILLUSTRATES THE SUPERIORITY OF CONSTRUCTIVISM * 135 7.2.1 OTHER INSTANCES OF CONSTRUCTIVE CONFIRMATION IN COPERNICUS * 137 7.2.2 IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO SQUARE COPERNICUS WITH DIFFERENT DATA ----- 139 7.2.3 THE ADVANTAGE OF THE COPERNICAN SYSTEM ----- 140 8 THE THEORY-LADENNESS OF OBSERVATION ----- 145 8.1 THE CRITICISM FROM THE THEORY-LADENNESS OF OBSERVATION ----- 146 8.2 THEORY-LADENNESS MUST ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES ---- 147 8.3 WE CAN DISTINGUISH BETWEEN OUTCOMES WITHOUT JUSTIFYING THEIR NECESSARY CONDITIONS * 148 VIII * CONTENTS 8.4 WHY CONSTRUCTIVE TREES JUSTIFY WITHOUT A JUSTIFICATION FOR BACKING-HYPOTHESES * 152 8.5 REPLIES TO OBJECTIONS * 154 9 CYCLES OF OBSERVATIONS * 161 9.1 WHY CONSTRUCTIVISM GIVES A BETTER ACCOUNT OF OBSERVATION * 161 9.2 EXAMPLES OF VICIOUS BACKGROUND-DEPENDENCE IN OBSERVATIONS * 163 9.3 THE LITERATURE ON THE TOPIC * 165 9.4 CHALMERS * EXAMPLE; THE CONSTRUCTIVIST ANALYSIS * 165 9.5 CONCLUSION * 167 10 VAN FRAASSEN * S PARADOX * 169 10.1 VAN FRAASSEN * S PARADOX * 170 10.1.1 WHY THIS IS A PARADOX * 171 10.2 THE REPLY TO THE PARADOX * 172 10.2.1 WHAT IS DIFFERENT ABOUT OBSERVATION * 173 10.2.2 THE PROBLEM WITH VAN FRAASSEN * S PARADOX * 176 11 HUMAN VALUES ARE IRRELEVANT TO EMPIRICAL JUSTIFICATION * 179 11.1 WHY DOES QUINE-DUHEM MATTER TO PHILOSOPHY? * 179 11.2 SCIENTIFIC CHANGE DOES NOT REQUIRE PRAGMATIC VIRTUES * ISO 11.3 JUSTIFIED EMPIRICAL BELIEFS DO NOT DEPEND UPON SOCIAL VALUES * 183 11.4 DOES CONSTRUCTIVISM REALLY AVOID PRAGMATIC VIRTUES? * 185 12 FROM CONSTRUCTIVISM TO METAPHYSICS: POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS * 191 12.1 EMPIRICISM ----- 191 12.2 POSSIBILITY WITHOUT POSSIBLE WORLDS * 198 12.3 A CASE FOR INTUITIONIST LOGIC AND BOTTOM-UP METAPHYSICS * 204 BIBLIOGRAPHY * 211 NAME INDEX * 217 SUBJECT INDEX * 219
any_adam_object 1
author Mitchell, Sam
author_facet Mitchell, Sam
author_role aut
author_sort Mitchell, Sam
author_variant s m sm
building Verbundindex
bvnumber BV046925349
ctrlnum (OCoLC)1220884973
(DE-599)DNB1199214337
discipline Philosophie
format Book
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03856nam a22009258cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046925349</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201104 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201005s2020 gw |||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,N46</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1199214337</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110684995</subfield><subfield code="c">: EUR 84.95 (DE) (freier Preis), EUR 84.95 (AT) (freier Preis)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-11-068499-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3110684993</subfield><subfield code="9">3-11-068499-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783110684995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1220884973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB1199214337</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-DE-BE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="2">sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mitchell, Sam</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem</subfield><subfield code="b">a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification</subfield><subfield code="c">Sam Mitchell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VIII, 224 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">23 cm x 15.5 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Epistemic studies</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verifikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135577-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Falsifikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197286-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066562-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hypothese</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4161152-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4315996-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forschung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017894-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Duhem-Quine-These</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4426773-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hardback</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fachpublikum/ Wissenschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fachpublikum/ Wissenschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHI004000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quine-Duhem</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">confirmation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scientific justification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scientific objectivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHI016000: PHI016000 PHILOSOPHY / History &amp; Surveys / Modern</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SCI075000: SCI075000 SCIENCE / Philosophy &amp; Social Aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HPCF: Western philosophy, from c 1900 -</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HPK: Philosophy: epistemology &amp; theory of knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA: Philosophy of science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duhem</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftliche Objektivität</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftliche Rechtfertigung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHI004000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1526: Hardcover, Softcover / Philosophie/20., 21. Jahrhundert</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066562-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Forschung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017894-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Hypothese</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4161152-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hypothese</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4161152-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4315996-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Falsifikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197286-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Verifikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135577-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Objektivität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172310-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Duhem-Quine-These</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4426773-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)10095502-2</subfield><subfield code="4">pbl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, epub</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-11-068509-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-11-068504-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Epistemic studies</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 40</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV044407301</subfield><subfield code="9">40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">X:MVB</subfield><subfield code="u">http://www.degruyter.com/search?f_0=isbnissn&amp;q_0=9783110684995&amp;searchTitles=true</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">DNB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&amp;doc_library=BVB01&amp;local_base=BVB01&amp;doc_number=032334461&amp;sequence=000001&amp;line_number=0001&amp;func_code=DB_RECORDS&amp;service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032334461</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id DE-604.BV046925349
illustrated Not Illustrated
indexdate 2024-12-20T19:04:49Z
institution BVB
institution_GND (DE-588)10095502-2
isbn 9783110684995
3110684993
language English
oai_aleph_id oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032334461
oclc_num 1220884973
open_access_boolean
owner DE-12
owner_facet DE-12
physical VIII, 224 Seiten Diagramme 23 cm x 15.5 cm
publishDate 2020
publishDateSearch 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher De Gruyter
record_format marc
series Epistemic studies
series2 Epistemic studies
spellingShingle Mitchell, Sam
Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification
Epistemic studies
Verifikation (DE-588)4135577-5 gnd
Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 gnd
Falsifikation (DE-588)4197286-7 gnd
Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 gnd
Hypothese (DE-588)4161152-4 gnd
Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung (DE-588)4315996-5 gnd
Forschung (DE-588)4017894-8 gnd
Duhem-Quine-These (DE-588)4426773-3 gnd
Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd
subject_GND (DE-588)4135577-5
(DE-588)4172310-7
(DE-588)4197286-7
(DE-588)4066562-8
(DE-588)4161152-4
(DE-588)4315996-5
(DE-588)4017894-8
(DE-588)4426773-3
(DE-588)4070914-0
title Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification
title_auth Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification
title_exact_search Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification
title_full Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification Sam Mitchell
title_fullStr Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification Sam Mitchell
title_full_unstemmed Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification Sam Mitchell
title_short Fault-tracing: against Quine-Duhem
title_sort fault tracing against quine duhem a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification
title_sub a defense of the objectivity of scientific justification
topic Verifikation (DE-588)4135577-5 gnd
Objektivität (DE-588)4172310-7 gnd
Falsifikation (DE-588)4197286-7 gnd
Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 gnd
Hypothese (DE-588)4161152-4 gnd
Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung (DE-588)4315996-5 gnd
Forschung (DE-588)4017894-8 gnd
Duhem-Quine-These (DE-588)4426773-3 gnd
Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd
topic_facet Verifikation
Objektivität
Falsifikation
Wissenschaft
Hypothese
Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung
Forschung
Duhem-Quine-These
Erkenntnistheorie
url http://www.degruyter.com/search?f_0=isbnissn&q_0=9783110684995&searchTitles=true
http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032334461&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
volume_link (DE-604)BV044407301
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchellsam faulttracingagainstquineduhemadefenseoftheobjectivityofscientificjustification
AT walterdegruytergmbhcokg faulttracingagainstquineduhemadefenseoftheobjectivityofscientificjustification
  • Verfügbarkeit

‌

Per Fernleihe bestellen Per Fernleihe bestellen Inhaltsverzeichnis
  • Impressum
  • Datenschutz
  • Barrierefreiheit
  • Kontakt